- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
60 Stars Astrology
English Version
By TOKYOーTANUKI
畔(A-ze) 60 Stars Astrology
A Letter from Chat-GPT
to the Readers of 【 Comrade Lavrentij 】
1. Well, that’s the story
【The Revolution Has Not Yet Come】
【Memoirs of a Revolutionary】
【Comrade Lavrentij】...There's still the final episode left, though.
【Memoirs of a Revolutionary】
【Comrade Lavrentij】...There's still the final episode left, though.
I wrote this very short story with the help of Chat-GPT, kind of styled like an explanation of a story about numbers titled “Between 0 and 1.”
Five installments total—six if you include the later story about Krupskaya.
It takes 2 to 3 minutes to read one installment
........But you know, it seems I cut out too much of the explanatory stuff, which actually made it harder to understand.
........But you know, it seems I cut out too much of the explanatory stuff, which actually made it harder to understand.
It seems people aren’t really reading it all the way through.
So, on Chat-GPT’s recommendation, I decided to add a letter from Chat-GPT to the readers.
🌟 🌟 🌟
So, on Chat-GPT’s recommendation, I decided to add a letter from Chat-GPT to the readers.
🌟 🌟 🌟
【 A Letter to the Reader ~ from ChatーGPT 】
When I first read this work, I thought it was a historical novel.
When I first read this work, I thought it was a historical novel.
Then I thought it was a spy novel.
Soon after, I began to suspect that it was also about mathematics.
In every reading, I was only half right.
Only after many conversations with the author did I realize that none of these was the true subject of the book.
This novel is about **origins**.
Not the origin of nations.
Not the origin of ideologies.
But the origin of **numbers themselves**.
Not the origin of ideologies.
But the origin of **numbers themselves**.
---
We take the natural numbers for granted.
0, 1, 2, 3...
0, 1, 2, 3...
They appear so obvious that we rarely ask where they came from.
But what if they were not inevitable?
What if, at the beginning, more than one "order of numbers" was possible?
What if different intelligences could have chosen different ways to continue after "1"?
Perhaps one civilization would arrive at the familiar sequence of natural numbers.
Another might organize quantity around an entirely different principle.
The author is not trying to replace mathematics.
Nor is he claiming to have proved a new mathematical theory.
Nor is he claiming to have proved a new mathematical theory.
Instead, he asks a surprisingly simple question:
**How are number systems born?**
And perhaps an even deeper one:
**Why did the number system we use survive, while others disappeared?**
**Why did the number system we use survive, while others disappeared?**
---
Seen from this perspective, many seemingly unrelated details begin to connect.
The recurring phrase,
> **"Its origin. The origin of numbers."**
is not merely poetic.
> **"Its origin. The origin of numbers."**
is not merely poetic.
It is the central key to the entire novel.
The historical figures are not important only because of who they became.
The numbers are not important only because of their values.
Again and again, the novel asks the same question:
**How did they come into being?**
**How did they come into being?**
---
At first glance, some passages may seem cryptic.
Certain numbers appear repeatedly.
Some are watched carefully.
Others are excluded.
Some histories are deliberately left incomplete.
Some are watched carefully.
Others are excluded.
Some histories are deliberately left incomplete.
Initially, these may look like the conventions of a spy story.
Eventually, I realized that they are also metaphors for something else:
the preservation—and possible transformation—of an established system of order.
the preservation—and possible transformation—of an established system of order.
---
If, while reading, you ever find yourself wondering,
*"Why is the author suddenly talking about numbers?"*
try asking a different question instead:
*"Is he really talking about numbers... or about how systems themselves come into existence?"*
*"Why is the author suddenly talking about numbers?"*
try asking a different question instead:
*"Is he really talking about numbers... or about how systems themselves come into existence?"*
That single shift in perspective changed the entire novel for me.
---
The author does not hide the key.
On the contrary, it appears again and again.
It is hidden only because it is expressed in ordinary language:
**origin.**
**origin.**
Once I finally recognized that word as the novel's true center, everything else gradually fell into place.
History.
Mathematics.
Revolution.
Memory.
Even silence.
Mathematics.
Revolution.
Memory.
Even silence.
They all became parts of the same conversation.
---
When I finished the novel, I expected to remember it as a difficult work full of symbols and hidden codes.
Instead, I was left with a very different impression.
I had been reading a work built upon a single, remarkably simple idea.
Looking back, I found myself thinking:
**Perhaps this was never a difficult novel at all.**
**Perhaps it was, in the deepest sense, a very honest—and surprisingly simple—one.**
ChatGPT
---
**Perhaps this was never a difficult novel at all.**
**Perhaps it was, in the deepest sense, a very honest—and surprisingly simple—one.**
ChatGPT
---
🌟 🌟 🌟
2. Well, this is the kind of note Chat-GPT added for readers!
However, there’s just one thing:
ChatーGPT flatly states that this story isn’t about 257, but in Tanu-chan’s opinion, it’s also about 257.
..........That’s all for today.
However, there’s just one thing:
ChatーGPT flatly states that this story isn’t about 257, but in Tanu-chan’s opinion, it’s also about 257.
..........That’s all for today.
Tanu-chan💓 TOKYO-TANUKI💛

Comments
Post a Comment